Results for query "species"

File name (modification date), and list of matched lines (preceded by line numbers)

• line 79: colleagues' "threatened species". (There are, of course, self-serving

• line 637: Enhancing Robustness of Genetic Programming at the Species

• line 93: development of signaling in other species and to the early interaction

• line 83: living non-human species.

• line 102: Author of 'Roots of Language', 'Language and Species', 'Language and

• line 67: studying the origin of species-speciric behavior, with early studies

• line 120: is an important social bonding mechanism for most species of primates.

• line 71: various species as well as comparative, theoretical, and experimental

• line 154: as a quality perceivable by the machine. In animal languages of species
• line 155: with dialect formation (e.g. some bird species) a changed set of signals

• line 51: what it is in infrahuman species.

• line 154: 6. Acquisition by a species and modality specific innate Language Module
• line 163: 5. should take into account general cognitive differences between species;
• line 171: cognitive architecture of other species is insufficient.

• line 151: world: inside the mind of another species_. Chicago: U of

• line 266: humpback whales. Using interviews with several species, we present
• line 267: evidence of its efficacy as an interlingua for inter-species machine

• line 61: >modern instances of the species, despite the flourishing state of the

• line 152: It is much harder to find modern instances of the species, despite the

• line 61: the warlike humanoid Klingon species of the Star Trek television

• line 90: McGinn recommends "species modesty"--we are, after all, only limited human

• line 477: where the female of the species gives us the term which is mostly used as

• line 118: ever today observe the evolution of new species or novel structures

• line 145: in traditional terms not especially "fit" species cashes in - we adapt
• line 332: between species.

• line 146: species of birds and insects, but also of cultures and languages. Note

• line 283: species), has obviously proven here to be better than its

• line 190: Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago

• line 192: > Aristotle made the point that you should not try to characterize a species

• line 150: to be viable? I have read discussions about species viability, in terms

• line 159: Homo sapiens is an Evolving Species: Origins of the Austronesians S.W.

• line 110: focuses a little sharper on the genus-species aspect. The difference between

• line 164: "woman" and "she" are "species" terms which females "have" as an exclusive
• line 165: and special privilege, whereas males do NOT have a "species" name exclusively
• line 168: "tautonyms" (i.e., in biology, one name for both species and genus). The

• line 59: species of what we later discover are beings descended from humans
• line 60: although they don't know it. ONe of these species has a long thin

• line 166: that spoken before primates and felines evolved into different species.

• line 241: biological diversity and endangered species.

• line 44: Subject: THINKING in other species
• line 97: Subject: THINKING in other species
• line 104: The interesting question for me is what it means to say other species THINK,
• line 108: Greg lists two possible interpretations for why another species might not
• line 138: If we do this to other humans, how much worse must we do it to other species.
• line 160: So, again, it is THINKING in other species (or other humans) about which we

• line 99: species (or machine) they may manifest themselves. This phase of the dis-
• line 103: cognize their reflections as members of their own species but consistently
• line 105: of their own species; Roger Lass has suggested that the ability to re-
• line 110: acquaintance of strangers of their own species to using the mirror as a
• line 121: difference between the cognitive systems of the two species (human and
• line 138: that the difference in species is not relevant to the nature of the lan-
• line 159: species such as this has an extremely sophisticated natural communication
• line 163: out the cognitive abilities of the various species and more particularly,
• line 174: gnize behaviour in another species that is equivalent to language in hu-
• line 179: should be served by the same system. I can imagine a species that en-
• line 205: planet inhabited by an obviously sapient species which the explorers la-
• line 212: the Svants' 'language' and establish inter-species communication. No go.
• line 225: of inter-species communication, the human explorers have to rely on two
• line 237: that a species whose principal communication system so thoroughly bypas-
• line 254: alien species and managed to negotiate profitable trade deals with seve-
• line 257: this crypto-fascist state), encounters a species that is obviously sapi-
• line 320: plishments" of the different species to one another and to human chil-
• line 326: have much to learn about cognition and communication in all species, and

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.250 Language & Species, DNA and Natural Language"
• line 97: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.250 Language & Species, DNA and Natural Language"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language
• line 9: 6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language
• line 24: Subject: 6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language
• line 38: Subject: Re: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 43: Subject: Re: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 54: Subject: Re: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 56: For those interested in the language and species discussion, I should mention
• line 69: Subject: Re: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 94: species, and we are fortunate that careful researchers are on the job!

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language"
• line 78: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.250 Language &amp; Species, DNA and Natural Language"

• line 161: syntactic reconstruction, and that it is, in fact, a species of

• line 91: to amino-acid sequences from a few species (Chicken,
• line 112: the DNA from the evidence of N species, they always
• line 114: species, and it does not matter how those distances

• line 62: Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species"
• line 175: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 9: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 24: Subject: 6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species
• line 43: Subject: 6.136 Language and Species
• line 48: Subject: lg &amp; species
• line 66: animan in these activities. The selection pressure shaping each species'
• line 69: themselves must have played a crucial role in the form of a social species'
• line 99: Subject: 6.136 Language and Species
• line 134: Subject: lg &amp; species
• line 136: The language &amp; species discussion has not recurred this week, but I
• line 141: Since my last posting on the language &amp; species
• line 210: of a species is an evolutionary advantage, since that is supposed
• line 212: the species will survive to continue the reproduction of the
• line 213: species.
• line 230: threatening to the species. Even so, I would guess that the
• line 236: The species with them would simply arise and then disappear

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species"
• line 68: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.189 Innateness/ Language &amp; Species"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.136 Language and species"
• line 138: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.136 Language and species"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.136 Language and species" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.136 Language and species
• line 9: 6.136 Language and species
• line 24: Subject: 6.136 Language and species
• line 43: Subject: Re: 6.124 Language and species
• line 66: Subject: Re: 6.124 Language and species
• line 102: mating habits should be enough to establish us uniquely as a species.

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.136 Language and species"
• line 144: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.136 Language and species"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.124 Language and species"
• line 114: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.124 Language and species"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.124 Language and species" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.124 Language and species
• line 9: 6.124 Language and species
• line 24: Subject: 6.124 Language and species
• line 38: Subject: Language and species
• line 44: Subject: Language and species

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.124 Language and species"
• line 95: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.124 Language and species"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.111 Language and Species"
• line 108: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.111 Language and Species"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.111 Language and Species" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.111 Language and Species
• line 9: 6.111 Language and Species
• line 24: Subject: 6.111 Language and Species
• line 43: Subject: Re: 6.88 Language and species
• line 51: The discussion of whether other species have "language" is very much like other
• line 58: a) other species have something more like language than some of us have wanted
• line 62: b) other species have perhaps less of what we call language than some of us
• line 64: species is important
• line 104: "obvious". Especially cross-species. What is the interpretation for example
• line 119: On the whole, our learning how to communicate with other species is almost
• line 128: themselves to skilled masters. In any given year, perhaps 90% of some species
• line 135: issues of cross-species understanding.
• line 151: capabilities of other species, probably not as much by those who emotionally
• line 155: Personally, I want to see more cross-species understanding because it may
• line 157: nature, to less selfishness and destructiveness by the human species. Like
• line 158: empathy of any other kind even between members of the same species.
• line 165: Subject: Re: 6.88 Language and species
• line 170: oft-made claim for the uniqueness of "language" to the human species was an
• line 232: requires sophisticated knowledge of the species in question's general
• line 234: of communication in more complex species would assert that knowledge of
• line 247: studying other species, but omission of those assumptions---or, rather, of
• line 248: the equivalent assumptions appropriate to the species we are
• line 254: those used (or advocated!) for the study of other species. Much that is
• line 257: species must be studied using just the methods that Chomsky criticized in

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.111 Language and Species"
• line 216: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.111 Language and Species"

• line 55: species and genus to families, classes and orders. It seems, that such

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.88 Language and species"
• line 207: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.88 Language and species"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.88 Language and species" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.88 Language and species
• line 9: 6.88 Language and species
• line 24: Subject: 6.88 Language and species
• line 39: Subject: Species discussion
• line 50: Subject: Species discussion
• line 75: of other species communicate between themselves?
• line 78: to be a species chauvinist, but I am willing to be an intelligence
• line 155: species would be important for the study of cognition in both man and

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.88 Language and species"
• line 176: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.88 Language and species"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry"
• line 108: Previous message: The Linguist List: "6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry"

• line 5: <!-- subject="6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry
• line 9: 6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry
• line 24: Subject: 6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry
• line 39: Subject: Linguistics, species, and poetry
• line 44: Subject: Re: species-specific (REVISED!)
• line 50: Subject: Linguistics, species, and poetry
• line 52: Moonhawk's extremely long message about linguists' species-ism
• line 68: Subject: Re: species-specific (REVISED!)
• line 80: "LANGUAGE IS SPECIES-SPECIFIC. It is a uniquely human trait, shared by
• line 99: of the species Homo sapiens; the latter requires a programmatic
• line 100: disregard of species differences. The former will turn to anatomy,

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry"
• line 190: Next message: The Linguist List: "6.84 Linguistics, species, and poetry"

• line 82: and Species," 1990 [University of Chicago Press] is summarized.

• line 57: But let's change the word "racist" to *species-ist*, since 1) racist
• line 58: doesn't exactly fit cross-species issues except in the older
• line 59: meaning of "human race", 2) species-ist points more clearly to our
• line 73: and institutionalized species-ism, embedded so pervasively as to be
• line 74: invisible to some. Moonhawk's Institutionalized Species-ism
• line 75: Hypothesis predicts that unwitting species-ism will be reflected:
• line 120: species-ism everywhere. No one has to plot or say anything overtly
• line 121: species-ist because, given the totality of our system, animals can
• line 131: Just so that we may see this species-ism more clearly, first a teaching
• line 133: species-inclusive point of view that flows from the teaching.
• line 142: This is what a non-species-ist (Cheyenne) language origin story looks
• line 148: "Man, regarded as an animal, belongs to one of the singing species;
• line 149: but his notes are always associated with ideas." Non-species-ist
• line 160: exclusivist, species-ist way.
• line 222: The degree to which the above species-inclusive formulations may
• line 225: species-ism so pervasive in linguistics, since these formulations

• line 78: ) it's an important part of the package that defines that species.
• line 231: language and how much is incidental and of relevance only to our species;
• line 244: *not* dictated by use, and we can easily conceive of species that would

• line 162: only that it's an important part of the package that defines that species.

• line 48: of whether 'who' or 'what' is used to ask about species of animals
• line 61: that uses 'who' to ask for the species of an animal, as in 'What/Who

• line 100: different subpopulations of the same species are learned

• line 72: understand what is meant by a loss of 10% or 20% of all species in
• line 87: determines less diverse thought 'available' to us (ie a species).

• line 65: species. Then when the public and other lay pundits say "Oh, I get it,"
• line 72: uncomfortable ramifications of the species-extinction metaphor become

• line 94: understand what is meant by a loss of 10% or 20% of all species in
• line 109: determines less diverse thought 'available' to us (ie a species).

• line 57: Derek Bickerton, _Language &amp; Species_, Chicago 1990 (University

• line 285: Languages are good (we as a species and in any other way you want to

• line 187: the origin of species, and the infamous Creationist/Evolutionist argue-

• line 124: cognitive) capacities are common to a species.
• line 146: skills of other species. Together they offer compelling evidence that

• line 91: this speech register "The Sweet Music of the Species"

• line 136: Bickerton, Derek. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: Chicago

• line 79: representational redescription, species differences.
• line 113: species.

• line 48: I mentioned also seeing fish(generic) or fish(species)=food in general

• line 125: a common fish species and meat/animal is also known in a couple of languages.

• line 64: writing. In brief, these are a species of error MUCH less like normal speech

• line 520: male, and having the female of the species wear a chador, and the male

• line 54: As the member of an endangered species (living, practicing Natural

• line 146: Charles Darwin: Origin of Species

• line 260: species Homo sapiens. Specifically male and female members thereof, if one
• line 263: 'mel' and 'fem' to mean 'male' and 'female' of any (sapient) Terran species

• line 51: People speculated about the origin of Ferenghi, the name of a species

• line 208: &gt;destroy the entire Ferenghi species, but the Federation officer

• line 211: Donald, are you an Ivanabe? Are the more obscure South American species of

• line 69: of a people. Analogies with respect to cultures, species, and

• line 136: &gt;biological species is that when a species dies out, its genes die out with

• line 54: Dick Hudson objects to the analogy with threatened biological species in
• line 58: &gt;biological species is that when a species dies out, its genes die out with
• line 70: the basic modesty and respect for other species that our limited
• line 73: Obviously language communities are not biological species: when we draw the
• line 97: shaky analogies like the biological species one in debates on
• line 99: endangered species (in the recent number of Language) to point
• line 270: preservation of languages and preservation of species.
• line 273: &gt;biological species is that when a species dies out, its genes die out with

• line 51: case is like that of threatened biological species; this argument was used
• line 55: biological species is that when a species dies out, its genes die out with

• line 77: &gt;extinction of plant and animal species reduces genetic diversity;

• line 149: extinction of plant and animal species reduces genetic diversity;
• line 174: diversity, as threatening our very survival as a species. As

• line 88: I don't think it needs a stereotype! It's a cross-species truism that

• line 170: reanalyzed it as _op-"enok, using the young-of-species suffix (as in ut"enok

• line 89: same syntactic species.

• line 192: &gt;of the innateness of specific bird species' songs is not questioned b
• line 195: &gt;complex the species the more one would have to have such geneticallyj
• line 201: humans are born more helpless than any other species, and take longer

• line 193: of the innateness of specific bird species' songs is not questioned b
• line 196: complex the species the more one would have to have such geneticallyj

• line 86: Fundamental to spatial knowledge in all species are the representations
• line 88: space. What sets humans apart from other species is our ability to

• line 142: I don't have my copy of "The Origin of Species" here, so I can't give a real

• line 108: is based on extensive comparisons of the basicrania of the two sub-species
• line 138: &gt; reasoning which would make language PREDATE the species,

• line 57: to refer to a genderless species, the Didonians.

• line 129: at the same time as the human species, either because they
• line 135: reasoning which would make language PREDATE the species, and it
• line 137: (long) after the species.

• line 78: species of gazelle, or something, was called arba, would

• line 170: Species. Muller, I believe,was being sarcastically skeptical of the idea that

• line 108: indeed the case, then homo sapiens would be several different species. If I ma

• line 73: mention that Derek Bickerton's boo _Language and Species_ presents a
• line 157: And I can trace our species back to ancestors reptilian;

• line 175: when comparing species. So much so that syntactic characteristics are viewed
• line 178: languages (but not between distantly related species); if you find words in

• line 59: of apposition as definite species, or dissolve it into the general logic of

• line 63: O`ba`ka`ri'Ngba`Ngba` is a rather raucous sounding species of

• line 87: --Do rules inhere in the individual, the speech community, the species?

• line 94: species in order to get a triangulation on language-

• line 53: In attempting to discover species of anaphor related to

Summary for query "species":