Results for query "Pinker"

File name (modification date), and list of matched lines (preceded by line numbers)

• line 85: gradualistic account of language evolution presented by Steven Pinker

• line 122: Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development.

• line 80: First, Steve Pinker of MIT, who suggested to me after the business
• line 90: Steve also suggested that I contact _Nature_. Without Steve Pinker's

• line 101: the definitive statement of this position (Pinker and Bloom) was

• line 213: Pinker (1989) justifies at length an account of such cases that goes, in
• line 335: Pinker, Stephen. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of

• line 111: Steven PINKER: The Language Mavens
• line 176: Understand", and "Talking from 9 to 5", Steve Pinker's "Language Instinct" and

• line 159: Speaker: Steve Pinker (Brain and Cognitive

• line 40: such researchers as Steven Pinker, Jerry Fodor, Yosef Grodzinsky, to

• line 67: Pinker here and ask ourselves "what has to be acquired"? English

• line 175: Pinker, S., & Mehler, J. (1988). Connections and

• line 125: Pinker, S. (1989). _Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of

• line 81: Steven Pinker

• line 105: Loraine K. Obler, Michel Paradis, Shana Poplack, Steven Pinker, Ben

• line 149: PINKER, Steven

• line 140: together on a regular basis. To borrow Steven Pinker's title, the language

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,"
• line 95: Previous message: The Linguist List: "7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,"

• line 5: <!-- subject="7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview," -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,
• line 9: 7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,
• line 24: Subject: 7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview, Specific/generic ref.
• line 54: Subject: Q: Pinker interview video
• line 84: Subject: Q: Pinker interview video
• line 89: Pinker. I believe it is available for purchase. Do any of you know a

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,"
• line 146: Next message: The Linguist List: "7.1116, Qs: Final consonants, Pinker interview,"

• line 281: children correctly learn. I also wonder if Pinker has commented

• line 103: &gt;think of is the property concerning dativizability. Pinker (1989:45-46)
• line 116: &gt;Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• line 132: &gt;may want to check out Pinker's "Learnability and Cognition: the Acquisition
• line 133: &gt;of Argument Structure" (1989). Pinker investigates the learnability

• line 82: Steven Pinker

• line 278: Steven Pinker, The Language Instinct: How the Mind creates Language,

• line 75: motor system (Pinker and Bloom) only indicates either the limitations

• line 95: motor system (Pinker and Bloom) only indicates either the limitations

• line 237: Pinker, Steven (????) "It speaks for itself" NewYorkTimes (NYT) article

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English"
• line 127: Previous message: The Linguist List: "7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English"

• line 5: <!-- subject="7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English
• line 9: 7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English
• line 24: Subject: 7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English
• line 54: Subject: Pinker The Language Instinct
• line 108: Subject: Pinker The Language Instinct
• line 113: view that Pinker's ideas are sound and useful - or that, as I am

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English"
• line 128: Next message: The Linguist List: "7.376, Qs: Occitan &amp; Gascon, Pinker, Adjective ordering in English"

• line 74: Steven Pinker

• line 146: Pinker, pp. 342-351
• line 149: Pinker, pp. 32-39,
• line 179: Pinker, pp. 332-432;
• line 214: Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow.

• line 174: The following are from Steven Pinker (MIT), _The Language Instinct_, (1994
• line 228: My syntax prof told me about this one, and it is in Pinker, too (page 186):

• line 201: (e.g., Pinker's works) inevitably have an effect on their readers'

• line 133: Bloom); The case of verbs (Fisher et al, Pinker, Grimshaw); and
• line 162: Fisher et al, Pinker) in terms of learning issues.
• line 290: syntactic subcategorization structures, Pinker ("How could a
• line 305: Pinker takes issue with Gleitman (1990), but in fact also with
• line 331: two controversial positions in Pinker 1989 and Gleitman 1990
• line 527: For Pinker:

• line 158: Pinker , Steven (1994), _The Language Instinct: the New Science of
• line 162: Pinker is highly opinionated, which gives the book a robust integrity and

• line 79: Ah, now we've gotten to the crux of it -- much against Pinker's stand
• line 83: Apache -- echoing a Pinker statement and relying on Pinker's quoting
• line 85: which Pinker identified as an Apache sentence, but which Whorf knew quite
• line 273: As you can see by now, Pinker -- like all other facile critics and
• line 277: ideas. Pinker, like Chomsky, loves logic (which grows out of the grammar

• line 75: But I have been reading Pinker's The Lg. Instinct. It is stated therein

• line 55: Stephen Pinker and Paul Bloom ("Natural language and natural
• line 58: me wary. Anyway, Pinker and Bloom (whose paper I haven't seen myself)
• line 61: as reported by Pinker and Bloom (without checking the source,

• line 268: primates, Steven Pinker, on p. 350 of his recent book The Language Ins-

• line 127: Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct (chapter 11). New York: Morrow.

• line 134: the LSA meeting in 1994, and in which Pinker, Gleitman, etc. appear?

• line 106: Steven Pinker, reviews a wide range of empirically-grounded studies of
• line 114: that Pinker surveys is corpus-based---indeed the documentation for the

• line 131: outstanding accomplishment."--Steven Pinker

• line 176: similar point was also made by Pinker in THE LANGUAGE INSTINCT in the

• line 86: Alternate: Gary Marcus, Steve Pinker and Leah Larkey, Univ. of Massachusetts

• line 83: Does Pinker's book, or Jackendoffs, seem sectarian, expressing views that

• line 24: Subject: 5.848 Varia: Popularization, Linguistics-bashing, Pinker's instinct
• line 51: Subject: Pinker's Language Instinct/popularization
• line 140: Subject: Pinker's Language Instinct/popularization
• line 142: After all the discussion on LINGUIST about Pinker and the popularization of
• line 146: insightful and well-written, Pinker's book is just plain funny?
• line 149: interesting and insightful book of similar type to Pinker's?

• line 114: mention of it in Pinker's book). I think it would be wonderful place

• line 177: people making an impact on neuroscience--Pinker, Jackendoff,
• line 179: syntax. I find Pinker, Jackendoff and Bellugi's work highly useful, too,

• line 97: Harvard Medical School at which Ursula Bellugi, Stephen Pinker and I are
• line 105: field as has been suggested. But do not despair. And books like Pinker's

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics"
• line 274: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics"

• line 5: <!-- subject="5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics
• line 9: 5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics
• line 24: Subject: 5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics
• line 36: Subject: Re: 5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 47: Subject: Re: 5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 49: A few remarks re Dan Alford's comments on Pinker on Whorf:
• line 54: dismissive, and said about the same about him as Pinker.
• line 84: My girlfriend forwarded the critique by Moonhawk of Pinker's critique of Whorf.
• line 85: I have only slight familiarity with either Pinker or Whorf, but I am a
• line 96: to Pinker I submit some comments on some sentences from Moonhawk's posting.
• line 98: &gt;Pinker, like most Whorf critics, doesn't understand that Whorf
• line 112: &gt;of time is a linguistic construct! Is Pinker taking on quantum physics

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics"
• line 224: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.780 Pinker's book, Quantum physics"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing"
• line 244: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing"

• line 5: <!-- subject="5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 9: 5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 24: Subject: 5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 36: Subject: Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 42: Subject: Pinker's book and linguist bashing
• line 44: I thoroughly enjoyed Claudia Brugman's review of Steven Pinker's book,
• line 47: bashing*! Consider the so-called Whorf chapter where Pinker takes on
• line 49: we shall see, since Pinker doesn't really consider Whorf a linguist, he
• line 53: Hypothesis (BLS), we find Pinker's text dominated by strawman positions
• line 71: In addition, Pinker either does not know about or is resolutely disregarding
• line 78: Pinker's bias is clear when he says "The idea that language shapes thinking
• line 83: While Pinker mentions Reagan's famous "Mistakes were made" (assuming
• line 93: so indelibly linked to in some people's minds. Who is Pinker fighting here
• line 95: wrong? Pinker, like most Whorf critics, doesn't understand that Whorf
• line 120: cultural notion of time is a linguistic construct! Is Pinker taking on
• line 123: Finally, let's examine Pinker's color words and Hopi time arguments. In
• line 138: ganglion cells? Got any citations for that, Pinker? Why is this form of
• line 141: And then there's the famous Hopi time. Pinker cites the work of Ekkehart
• line 163: how can I, or Pinker, in all good conscience trust or cite his work?
• line 169: determinist mode they can attack. Indeed, Pinker in just a few pages proves

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing"
• line 132: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.768 Pinker's book and linguist bashing"

• line 17: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity"
• line 132: Previous message: The Linguist List: "5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity"

• line 5: <!-- subject="5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity" -->
• line 8: Linguist List Archive: 5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity
• line 9: 5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity
• line 24: Subject: 5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity
• line 36: Subject: Pinker's book
• line 47: Subject: Pinker's book
• line 50: Pinker's book. I suppose it's on a number of people's summer reading list,
• line 75: struggled through Halliday and Hasan, who much more than Pinker attempt to
• line 87: Pinker implies. However, these are relatively minor quibbles in a work

• line 16: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity"
• line 273: Next message: The Linguist List: "5.761 Varia: Pinker's book, Chaology &amp; complexity"

• line 101: Gleitman's report. I was pretty horrified to read Pinker's report (in _The
• line 106: Despite the negatives reported in my recent review, I found Pinker's book
• line 111: irrational. (Maybe this is Pinker's punishment for his own
• line 112: linguist-bashing?) I started my review with a mention of Pinker's _Talk of
• line 121: BTW, I want to thank Pinker for responding to my review and pointing out

• line 56: MacDonald, Steve Pinker, and Grev Corbett. The references they suggested are
• line 105: Pinker, Steven and David Birdsong. (1979). Speakers' sensitivity to rules of
• line 109: Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. William Morrow; see pp. 166-
• line 134: Pinker, S. &amp; P. Bloom (1990) "Natural language and natural

• line 36: From: Steve Pinker &lt;steve@psyche.mit.edu&gt;
• line 42: From: Steve Pinker &lt;steve@psyche.mit.edu&gt;
• line 99: Steve Pinker

• line 55: I thought Steven Pinker did just that. Yet newspaper columnists who've read

• line 48: language_, by Steven Pinker. 1994, William Morrow.
• line 56: Pinker.
• line 79: the endeavors of linguistics. Pinker here highlights Chomsky's
• line 128: examples, of the technical terms which Pinker uses liberally (but generally
• line 133: I enjoyed much about this book. Pinker's writing style comes as close as
• line 144: I appreciated the fact that Pinker has compiled results from acquisition,
• line 149: take issue below with Pinker's conclusions from this evidence.
• line 202: Pinker presents this model as THE result from linguistics, and the only
• line 208: social diversity of the field? Does Pinker do a disservice to those whose
• line 217: those results. Pinker does not mention that other interpretations even
• line 230: Pinker neglects to mention that the results of the cited studies, and the
• line 264: unmentioned. This is particularly unfortunate given Pinker's (and the
• line 272: this question, except that Pinker has spent 400 pages precluding its

• line 137: Pinker, 1994 "The language mavens" chapter in The language instinct.

• line 84: that "language is innate," attributed by him to Steve Pinker

• line 93: Pinker's new _Language Instinct_, pp. 89-103. You know, presumably, of

• line 102: including that of Pinker and Jackendoff. An emphasis on

• line 45: Pinker, Steven THE LANGUAGE INSTINCT, 1994, 494 pages,

• line 53: Steve Pinker, and Herb Stahlke:
• line 79: - Pinker, Steven. l994. The language instinct. William Morrow and Co.

• line 105: pages as I recall) written by Steve Pinker and addressing "the language

• line 104: Alternations_ (U of Chicago press) and Pinker, S. (1989), _Learnability and

• line 95: And others (e.g. Lightfoot, Koster, Pinker, etc. etc.) have done the

• line 153: &gt;Prof. Connolly-- You might take a look at Stephen Pinker's
• line 170: I have not yet consulted Pinker's book, but this is a good lead. BTW,

• line 56: Pinker, and Geoff Pullum and Arnold Zwicky; the parasession on Grammar of

• line 117: (S. Pinker and L. Petitto). If you want to find out about a broad range

• line 121: for the early acquisition of language (such as that discussed by S. Pinker et.

• line 177: (2) read Pinker and Bloom, 'Natural Language and Natural Selection'

• line 133: Pinker,S. &amp; Bloom, P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral

• line 154: Linguistics_ (G. Prideaux ed.) and more recently the Pinker paper "Rules
• line 157: describes their acquisition and Pinker shows that both rule and associative

• line 208: question is partly addressed in an article by Steven Pinker that appeared

• line 84: Pinker and Prince: Interaction of Regular and Irregular Morphology

• line 168: Pinker and his colleagues, but even they admit that most of the details are

• line 70: Steven Pinker of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said

• line 183: recently on Steve Pinker's work. If people outside the discipline do

• line 131: Steven Pinker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• line 142: Irene Heim (L&amp;P) Steven Pinker (BCS)

• line 48: From: steve@psyche.mit.edu (Steve Pinker)
• line 138: From: steve@psyche.mit.edu (Steve Pinker)
• line 230: Steve Pinker
• line 236: John J. Kim, Steven Pinker, Alan Prince, and Sandeep Prasada (1991).
• line 240: Steven Pinker, et al. ``Of mice and men,'' In preparation.

• line 118: Keynote Speaker: Steven Pinker, MIT

• line 72: Steven Pinker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• line 51: KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Steven Pinker, MIT, "Rules of Language"

Summary for query "Pinker":